Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Konstantina Saliari ( konstantina.saliari@nhm.at ) Academic editor: Andrea Krapf
© 2025 Tim Langnitschke, Veronika Holzer, Georg Tiefengraber, Konstantina Saliari.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Langnitschke T, Holzer V, Tiefengraber G, Saliari K (2025) Archaeozoology of rituals: Objects 40 and 41 (“Small Sanctuaries”) of cult district 2 in Roseldorf (Lower Austria, Middle La Tène period). Annals of the Natural History Museum Vienna 126: 137-149. https://doi.org/10.3897/anhmw.168394
|
This study presents new archaeozoological research on the animal remains from the trenches of two square enclosures, Objects 40 and 41 (“Small Sanctuaries”), located in cult district 2 at Roseldorf-Sandberg. The faunal assemblages from the two enclosures differ significantly from the animal remains excavated in the settlement, especially concerning species composition, age structure, skeletal element representation, and butchery patterns indicating a different selection and use of animals. Furthermore, faunistic differences observed between the two investigated square enclosures (“Small Sanctuaries”) might be related to the different character of ritual activities performed at each area: cattle and horses are prevalent in Object 40, whereas remains of young pigs dominate in Object 41. Finally, the deposition of four skeletons of non-adult pigs in Object 41 offers important information concerning the season in which the ritual practices might have occurred; based on the age profiles, ritual activities in Object 41 probably took place during late autumn or early winter.
Animal bones, Middle La Tène, ritual practices, sanctuaries, square enclosure
The excavation at Roseldorf, some 70 km northwest of Vienna in Lower Austria, is located on the plateau and southern slope of the Sandberg, a gentle hill (Figs
The current study focuses on the faunal remains excavated from two square enclosures, Objects 40 and 41 from cult district 2 (Fig.
The aims of this contribution are: a) characterization of the animal assemblages and comparison with the previously investigated animal remains from the settlement and the “Great Sanctuary” (Object 1, cult district 1), b) discussion of the archaeozoological interpretation considering the specific archaeological contexts, c) contribution of the archaeozoological data for a better understanding of the square enclosures of the La Tène period, d) presentation and discussion of new aspects of the La Tène period rituals based on the faunal remains.
Location of Roseldorf in northeastern Austria. The visualisation of the topography and river flow accumulation are based on digital elevation 25x25m EU-DEM-v1.1 data. (https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-dem/eu-dem-v1.1. Lakes were taken from the EU-Hydro – River Network Database, retrieved on 19. June 2024, https://land.copernicus. eu/imagery-in-situ/eu-hydro/eu-hydro-river-network-database).
The animal remains were found in the trenches of the two square enclosures (Objects 40 and 41). In total, 119 faunal remains weighing 2739 g were retrieved from Object 40 and 1050 faunal remains weighing 6228 g were retrieved from Object 41. In addition to single elements, the skeletons of four non-adult pigs were documented in Object 41. Concerning the preservation of the material, a high number of animal bones exhibited butchery marks. Gnawing marks or fire induced alterations were not recorded.
The identification was carried out at the Natural History Museum Vienna (1. Zoological Department, Archaeological-Zoological Collection) using the osteological reference collection and the Adametz collection. For the separation between sheep and goat, the methods by Joachim Boessneck (
Sex estimation was conducted for adult cattle individuals based on metapodials (
In total, 119 animal bones and teeth were retrieved from Object 40 (Tables
Faunal composition from Object 40 (layer SE 2) in Roseldorf; number of identified specimens (NISP); minimum number of individuals (MNI).
| Object 40 (SE 2) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domesticated species | Wild species | ||||
| Element | Cattle | Sheep/goat | Pig | Horse | European hare |
| Processus frontalia | - | - | - | - | - |
| Calvaria | 3 | - | - | - | - |
| Maxilla | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mandibula | 10 | - | 2 | 6 | - |
| Hyoid | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vertebrae | 2 | - | - | 4 | - |
| Costae | 8 | - | - | - | - |
| Scapula | 3 | - | 1 | 3 | - |
| Humerus | 2 | - | 1 | - | 1 |
| Radius | 4 | - | - | - | - |
| Ulna | 3 | - | - | - | 1 |
| Carpalia | 9 | - | - | 1 | - |
| Sesamoidea | - | - | - | 2 | - |
| Metacarpus | 4 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Pelvis | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| Femur | 5 | 1 | - | - | - |
| Patella | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tibia | 9 | - | - | 1 | - |
| Os malleolare/ Fibula | - | - | - | - | - |
| Talus | 1 | - | - | 3 | - |
| Calcaneus | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tarsalia | 3 | - | - | 3 | - |
| Metatarsus | 2 | - | - | - | - |
| Metapodia | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| Phalanx 1 | 5 | - | 1 | 1 | - |
| Phalanx 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - |
| Phalanx 3 | - | - | - | - | - |
| NISP | 74 | 1 | 6 | 27 | 2 |
| NISP- % | 67.3% | 0.8% | 5.5% | 24.6% | 1.8% |
| MNI | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| MNI- % | 40% | 10% | 10% | 30% | 10% |
| Weight (g) | 2126 | 5 | 20.5 | 451 | 2 |
| Weight- % | 81.6% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 17.3% | 0.1% |
Faunal composition from Object 40 (layer SE 01 and SE? unknown) in Roseldorf.
| Object 40 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domesticated species | ||||||
| Element | Cattle | Horse | ||||
| SE:01 | SE:? | SE:? | SE:01 | SE:? | SE:? | |
| Calvaria | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Maxilla | - | - | 4 | - | - | - |
| Humerus | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| Radius | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| Femur | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tibia | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| NISP | 2 | 1 | 4 | 2 | - | - |
Out of 110 identified faunal remains, 108 (98.2%) belong to domesticated species, while two fragments (1.8%) were assigned to the European hare (Lepus europaeus). Based on NISP, the dominant taxon was cattle (67.3%) followed by horse (24.6%), pig (5.5%), and sheep/goat (0.8%). These results were also confirmed by the weight analysis: cattle constituted the prevalent species (81.6%), followed by horse (17.3%), pig (0.8%), and sheep/goat (0.2%). Due to the very low number of finds, further analyses focus largely on cattle.
Bos primigenius f. taurus
Based on the epiphyses, adult cattle dominate (Table
Equus ferus f. caballus
Concerning other domesticated species, further information was gained about horses. The height at withers was reconstructed for one individual at 131.1 cm (Table
Age reconstruction for cattle based on epiphyses from Object 40 in Roseldorf.
| Object 40 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Element | Open | Fused | |
| Cattle | Humerus | proximal | - | - |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Scapula | coracoid | - | 2 | |
| Radius | proximal | - | 3 | |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Ulna | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | - | - | ||
| Pelvis | symphysis | - | 1 | |
| Femur | proximal | 1 | 1 | |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Tibia | proximal | - | 2 | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Metacarpus | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Metatarsus | proximal | - | 2 | |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Phalanx 1 | proximal | 2 | - | |
| distal | - | - | ||
Age reconstruction for cattle and pig based on teeth from Objects 40 and 41 in Roseldorf.
| Object | Species | Tooth | Wear stage | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | + | ++ | +++ | |||
| 40 | Cattle | M3 | 1 | 1 | - | - |
| 41 | Cattle | Pd4 | - | 1 | - | - |
| M3 | 2 | 3 | - | - | ||
| Pig | Pd4/4 | - | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| M3 | 2 | - | - | - | ||
| Cattle – Sex distribution | |||
| Object 40 | |||
| Element | male | castrated | female |
| Metatarsus | - | 2 | - |
| Object 41 | |||
| Element | male | castrated | female |
| Metacarpus | - | 3 | - |
| Metatarsus | - | 1 | 2 |
Height at the withers for cattle and horse from Objects 40 and 41 based on long bones (
| Species | Element | Greatest length (mm) | Height at withers (cm) | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cattle | Radius | 271.0 | 116.5 | - |
| Metacarpus | 193.5 | 122.5 | castrated | |
| Metatarsus | 204.0 | 114.6 | castrated | |
| Metatarsus | 210.0 | 111.9 | female | |
| Horse | Radius | 319.0 | 131.1 | - |
| Metatarsus | 245.5 | 128.6 | - |
Faunal composition from Object 41 (layer SE 2) in Roseldorf; number of identified specimens (NISP); minimum number of individuals (MNI).
| Object 41 (SE 2) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domesticated species | |||||||
| Element | Cattle | Goat | Sheep/goat | Sheep | Pig | Horse | Chicken |
| Processus frontalia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Calvaria | 11 | - | - | - | 88 | - | - |
| Maxilla | 18 | - | 1 | - | 62 | 4 | - |
| Mandibula | 42 | - | 7 | - | 195 | 5 | - |
| Hyoid | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Vertebrae | 28 | - | - | - | 32 | - | 1 |
| Costae | 24 | - | - | - | 230 | - | - |
| Scapula | 10 | - | - | - | 13 | 1 | - |
| Humerus | 5 | 2 | - | - | 15 | 4 | - |
| Radius | 6 | - | - | - | 13 | 1 | - |
| Ulna | 2 | - | - | - | 13 | 1 | - |
| Carpalia | 4 | - | - | - | 14 | - | 1 |
| Sesamoidea | 2 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - |
| Metacarpus | 9 | - | - | - | 28 | 1 | - |
| Pelvis | 5 | - | - | - | 7 | - | - |
| Femur | 4 | - | - | - | 8 | - | - |
| Patella | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Tibia/ Tibiotarsus | 2 | - | - | - | 14 | 8 | - |
| Os malleolare/ Fibula | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Talus | 1 | - | - | - | 3 | - | - |
| Calcaneus | - | - | - | - | 5 | 1 | - |
| Tarsalia | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Metatarsus/ Tarsometatarsus | 3 | - | - | - | 8 | 4 | - |
| Metapodia | - | - | - | - | 4 | 1 | - |
| Phalanx 1 | 2 | - | - | 1 | 25 | - | - |
| Phalanx 2 | 2 | - | - | - | 19 | - | - |
| Phalanx 3 | 1 | - | - | - | 5 | - | - |
| NISP | 182 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 802 | 31 | 2 |
| NISP % | 17.7% | 0.2% | 0.8% | 0.1% | 78% | 3% | 0.2% |
| MNI | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 1 |
| MNI % | 23.8% | 9.5% | 9.5% | 4.8% | 28.6% | 19.1% | 4.8% |
| Weight (g) | 3543 | 53.5 | 11 | 0.5 | 915 | 1525 | 0.5 |
| Weight % | 58.6% | 0.9% | 0.2% | 0.0% | 15.1% | 25.2% | 0.0% |
Overall, 1050 faunal remains were excavated in Object 41 (Tables
Bos primigenius f. taurus
The body part representation (NISP) of cattle displayed a very high number of cranial elements (lacking of horn cores), ribs, and vertebrae. Long bones, shoulder, and pelvic bones, as well as small bones, including carpals, tarsals, and phalanges, were found in lower numbers (Table
Sus scrofa f. domestica
The skeletal element distribution for pigs exhibited surprising similarities to cattle indicating a higher number of cranial elements (Table
The four pig skeletons were found together with the other faunal remains in the trenches of the enclosure; therefore, mixing with single pig remains cannot be excluded. Two skeletons of pigs were found in the northern trench of the enclosure (Fig.
Concerning aging, the unfused epiphyses indicate the presence of four non-adult pig individuals. The presence of teeth in skeletons B and D enabled A more precise age determination: skeleton (B) exhibited one premolar 4 with advanced wear (Pd4+++), two first molars (M1) in wear and a second molar (M2) not in wear, indicating an age between 6 and 8/9 months. Skeleton (D) exhibited four significantly worn premolars (Pd4/4+++) and two first molars (M1) with low wear level, suggesting an age between 6 and 7 months.
Equus ferus f. caballus
Concerning the remaining faunal material, additional information could be obtained for horses. The examination of the epiphyses showed primarily adult individuals (n = 19). Finally, the height at withers was reconstructed for one individual at 128.6 cm (Table
The faunal remains from Objects 40 and 41 exhibited a high number of chop marks, indicating disarticulation, dismemberment, portioning, and marrow extraction. Only a few cut marks were noted on fragments of scapulae from horses.
Chop marks on cattle crania suggest the removal of horns, whereas chops on the occipital condyles and the mandibles indicate additional separation. Chop marks on the thoracic vertebrae suggest the removal of the processus spinosus, whereas ribs were chopped in smaller portions. Long bones were butchered at different parts on the midshaft and sometimes at the joints. Additionally, longitudinal chop marks on radius, tibia, and metapodials suggest marrow extraction. Scapula remains were mainly chopped longitudinally.
Concerning pigs, few chop marks were noted on crania, which were mostly longitudinally chopped. Chop marks on mandibles mainly suggest dismemberment. Ribs were chopped in smaller parts, whereas long bones and metapodials exhibited diagonal and transversal chops on the midshaft and sometimes on the joints. Diagonal and transversal chop marks were found on the scapula and pelvis, mainly on the acetabulum and foramen obturatum. No butchery marks were found on the four skeletons of non-adult pigs.
Similar to cattle and pigs, chop marks on the mandibles of horses were connected to dismemberment. Chops on thoracic vertebrae suggest the removal of the processus spinosus. Diagonal and transversal chop marks were noted on scapulae. Additionally, oblique cut marks were documented on the spina scapulae. Long bones were mainly chopped on the midshaft and the joints, but tibia and metapodials were also longitudinally split.
This section contains the most important archaeozoological observations from Objects 40 and 41 and compares them with the already published archaeozoological results from the settlement of Roseldorf-Sandberg (
The comparative study of the faunal assemblages from Roseldorf provides significant insights into ritual (atypical) and daily (typical, regular) contexts – a separation which is not always straightforward. Ritual practices might also occur during ‘daily business’ and vice versa, and rituals may also be influenced by daily experiences or techniques. Furthermore, the archaeozoological results from Objects 40 and 41 can significantly contribute to the discussion about the function of the square enclosures of the La Tène period (
Species composition (Fig.
Remains of sheep/ goat (40.7%, NISP data) dominated in the settlement of Roseldorf, followed by pigs (39.3%) and cattle (15.9%). The three ritual sites show contrasting species compositions: in Object 40 as well as in layer 3 of the “Great Sanctuary” cattle and horses were most common, whereas in Object 41 pigs clearly prevailed.
In many La Tène period settlements, cattle constitute the economically most important domesticated species (
In contrast, the archaeozoological record shows that remains of horses were usually underrepresented, with notable exceptions (e.g.
Age profiles (Fig.
Cattle remains from the settlement and the “Great Sanctuary” (Object 1) indicate that cattle were slaughtered at a later stage (older than 7 years) after secondary exploitation. In contrast – although the number of teeth recovered from Objects 40 and 41 was low – the existing data show that cattle were mainly slaughtered as young adults, suggesting an emphasis on very good meat quality.
Concerning pigs, there is a clear prevalence of non-adult individuals in Object 41 (Fig.
Sex distribution (Fig.
Concerning sexing, cattle was the only species that could be compared among the different assemblages in Roseldorf. The majority of adult cattle remains in ritual assemblages (Objects 40, 41, and “Great Sanctuary”) and the settlement of Roseldorf belonged to castrated individuals.
Skeletal element distribution (Figs
Although the low number of faunal remains from Object 40 did not allow further insights into this aspect, the single elements found in Object 41 showed a strict preference of non-meaty regions for both cattle and pigs. This is in great contrast to the assemblages of the “Great Sanctuary” (Object 1), where cattle and horses (the prevalent species) were mainly represented by meaty regions (fore and hind limbs) and pigs by whole individuals (
Animal populations (morphotypes)
Two cattle morphotypes were documented in the settlement of Roseldorf and the “Great Sanctuary”: the small-sized cattle, which was widely distributed during the La Tène period (
One cattle scapula from Object 40 seems to be significantly larger and more robust than the other scapulae (Fig.
Additional data concerning morphotypes were obtained for horses. The estimated height at withers (128.6 and 131 cm) is similar to the values recorded for the “Great Sanctuary” (113.8 and 132.5 cm;
Butchery patterns (Fig.
Significant differences were documented concerning the butchery patterns observed on bones of cattle and horses. Although no remarkable variations were noted between the ritual assemblages of the “Great Sanctuary” and the settlement (
In Objects 40 and 41, scapulae, tibiae, and metapodials of cattle were split longitudinally (Fig.
Preservation
Animal remains from the settlement and the ritual assemblages in Roseldorf show clear differences concerning preservation. Some animal bones from the settlement were burnt and exhibited gnawing marks (mainly by dogs), in contrast, the faunal remains from contexts with ritual character did not exhibit similar modifications.
Seasonality
The four skeletons of piglets excavated in Object 41 allowed for first time information about the season during which the ritual activities were performed in this square enclosure. The estimation of the season of slaughter was based on the age at death reconstructed from the eruption and wear stages of teeth (
Faunal remains have been widely used as indicators of social identity, status, and differentiation (e.g. Ekroth – Wallensten
Based on the animal remains, the ritual activities that took place in the two square enclosures (Objects 40 and 41) were important for the participants. Keeping in mind the local archaeozoological record for the La Tène period (
The slaughter of castrated cattle individuals as young adults means that no secondary exploitation took place – for one of the economically most valuable species in prehistory (
Faunal composition from Object 41 (layer SE 03, 41/98, 56 and SE? unknown) in Roseldorf.
| Object 41 | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Domesticated species | ||||||||||
| Element | Cattle | Goat | Sheep/goat | |||||||
| SE:03 | SE:03 | SE:03 | SE:41/98 | SE:56 | SE:? | SE:03 | SE:? | SE:03 | SE:? | |
| Maxilla | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Mandibula | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 6 | 1 |
| Vertebrae | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| Humerus | 1 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Metacarpus | - | - | 5 | - | - | - | 1 | 1 | - | - |
| Pelvis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Femur | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| Talus | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - |
| NISP | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
Age reconstruction for cattle and pig based on epiphyses from Object 41 in Roseldorf.
| Object 41 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Species | Element | Open | Fused | |
| Cattle | Humerus | proximal | - | - |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Scapula | coracoid | - | 2 | |
| Radius | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | - | 4 | ||
| Pelvis | symphysis | - | 1 | |
| Tibia | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | - | 2 | ||
| Metacarpus | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Metatarsus | proximal | - | 3 | |
| distal | - | 1 | ||
| Phalanx 1 | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | - | - | ||
| Phalanx 2 | proximal | - | 2 | |
| distal | - | - | ||
| Pig | Humerus | proximal | 2 | - |
| distal | 2 | 1 | ||
| Scapula | coracoid | - | 1 | |
| Radius | proximal | 3 | - | |
| distal | 3 | - | ||
| Femur | proximal | 1 | - | |
| distal | - | - | ||
| Tibia | proximal | 4 | - | |
| distal | 5 | - | ||
| Metacarpus II | proximal | - | - | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Metacarpus III | proximal | - | 1 | |
| distal | 3 | - | ||
| Metacarpus IV | proximal | - | - | |
| distal | 7 | - | ||
| Metatarsus II | proximal | - | - | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Metatarsus III | proximal | - | - | |
| distal | 2 | - | ||
| Metatarsus IV | proximal | - | - | |
| distal | 1 | - | ||
| Phalanx 1 | proximal | 25 | - | |
| distal | - | - | ||
| Phalanx 2 | proximal | 19 | - | |
| distal | - | - | ||
Skeletal element distribution of cattle for different archaeological contexts in Roseldorf (NISP- %). Settlement n = 1043; “Great Sanctuary” (Object 1) n = 5810; Object 41 n = 182. Abbreviations: Sc: scapula, Hu: humerus, Ra: radius, Ul: ulna, Pe: pelvis, Fe: femur, Ti: tibia, Om: os malleolare, Pf: processus frontalia, Cv: calvaria, Mx: maxilla, Md: mandibula, Vt: vertebrae, Co: costae, Ca: carpalia, Ta: tarsalia, Pa: patella, Tl: talus, Cc: calcaneus, Mc: metacarpus, Mt: metatarsus, Mp: metapodials, Ph: phalanges.
Skeletal element distribution of pig for different archaeological contexts in Roseldorf (NISP- %). Settlement n = 2581; “Great Sanctuary” (Object 1) n = 1335; Object 41 n = 802. Abbreviations: Sc: scapula, Hu: humerus, Ra: radius, Ul: ulna, Pe: pelvis, Fe: femur, Ti: tibia, Fi: fibula, Cv: calvaria, Mx: maxilla, Md: mandibula, Vt: vertebrae, Co: costae, Ca: carpalia, Ta: tarsalia, Pa: patella, Tl: talus, Cc: calcaneus, Mc: metacarpus, Mt: metatarsus, Mp: metapodials, Ph: phalanges.
. Metric comparison (mm) of cattle scapulae from selected La Tène sites in Austria with Roseldorf, based on
| Cattle morphotype | Scapula measurement | Site | N | Minimum | Maximum | Average | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| small-sized | SLC | Dürrnberg-Ramsautal | 81 | 34.0 | 54.0 | 42.6 |
|
| Göttlesbrunn | 9 | 40.0 | 53.5 | 46.6 |
|
||
| Roseldorf – “Great Sanctuary” | 32 | 41.5 | 57.5 | 49.7 |
|
||
| Roseldorf - Object 40 | 1 | 43.0 | current study | ||||
| Dürrnberg-Ramsautal | 69 | 51.0 | 72.5 | 59.1 |
|
||
| GLP | Göttlesbrunn | 5 | 54.0 | 69.0 | 61.6 |
|
|
| Roseldorf – “Great Sanctuary” | 39 | 54.5 | 75.0 | 64.7 |
|
||
| Roseldorf Object 40 | 2 | 54.0 | 69.0 | 61.5 | current study | ||
| large-sized | SLC | Roseldorf – “Great Sanctuary” | 7 | 49.0 | 67.5 | 55.9 |
|
| Roseldorf - Object 40 | 1 | 57.0 | current study | ||||
| GLP | Roseldorf – “Great Sanctuary” | 5 | 65.5 | 82.5 | 72.2 |
|
|
| Roseldorf - Object 40 | 1 | 72.5 | current study | ||||
The investigation of the faunal assemblages from Roseldorf indicates significant differences between the settlement and areas interpreted as ritual spaces (Fig.
Furthermore, considerable faunistic variations were also detected among the three square enclosures (Fig.
Finally, the faunal assemblages from the ritual areas examined in the present work (Objects 40 and 41) as well as the archaeozoological results for the already published area of “Great Sanctuary” indicate a costly selection of animals for the rituals in Roseldorf, reflecting their great importance for the participants.